Projekt-Kategorien: Development Cooperation

Multi-Country Evaluation of Regional Knowledge and Leadership Areas: Area 4: Inclusion of all Out of School Children in Quality Learning in CEE/CIS

The purpose of the evaluation was (i) to assess the extent to which UNICEF’s contributions to program interventions addressed major child rights violations in education, reduced equity gaps and led to impact results for children; and (ii) to draw from learning practices, innovations and models for future UNICEF country programming processes.
The objective is, therefore:

  • to document and report on impact results in terms of changes in children’s life
  • to assess and demonstrate how such results were made possible through system changes; and
  • to document the contribution of UNICEF to these system changes.

In addition, the evaluation ensures that mechanisms for the assessment of impact results embrace issues of:

  • contextual adequacy (regarding tailoring programming approaches to the qualitative differences between inequities);
  • coordination (with other stakeholders);
  • coherence (across policies and other supporting interventions); and
  • protection (in terms of adequacy of the response of the respective education systems to protecting vulnerable groups).

Ultimately, the evaluation made a contribution towards improving future programming by adapting it to the specific groups of children out of school.

Sustainable Economic Development in Myanmar

Together with the German Institute for Development Evaluation (DEval), CEval supported three projects on sustainable economic development in Myanmar, aiming to create the preconditions for identifying and assessing their impacts. The support focussed on three projects in the fields of vocational training, private sector development and financial sector reforms, and they should provide the basis for the development of a coherent programme on sustainable economic development.

Accordingly, it was the task of CEval, together with DEval:

  1. contribute to quality, relevance and completeness of the project conceptions and to the implementation of a coherent goal and impact system
  2. establish the preconditions for identifying and evaluating project impacts
  3. contribute to programme designs
  4. conduct an impact evaluation.

To that end, a multi-level analysis and consultation concept had been developed, which consists of

  1. developing an encompassing impact model,
  2. defining an encompassing table of indicators,
  3. implementing a baseline study, and
  4. developing an impact-oriented monitoring system.

Independent Evaluations in the Sector Rural Development: Sustainable Management and Use of Natural Resources and Capacity Development in Central America

In this cycle of independent evaluations, there were three international development programs (all executed by the GIZ) to be evaluated by CEval:

  • Promoting sustainable use of resources and local economic development in Honduras (PRORENA), Honduras
  • Sustainable resource management and promotion of entrepreneurial competencies (MASRENACE), Nicaragua
  • Developing and strengthening competencies and capacities to manage natural resources in Central America (Alianza de Aprendizaje)

The evaluation aimed at studying all emerged (positive, as well as negative, intended as well as non-intended) changes in order to define the project results. Based on the logic of the “funnel approach”, first all sector relevant changes were detected and then the causal link to the program interventions were analyzed (–>result attribution).

To attain the relevant information and to construct the counterfactual situation, CEval used a mixed-methods approach. Concretely, CEval performed the following services:

  • Developing an overarching results model of the three interventions based on the project documents for assessing the project results,
  • Conducting qualitative interviews with key actors and focus group interviews with beneficiaries,
  • Administering a quantitative survey on the level of beneficiaries,
  • Bio-technical analyses of soil samples and biodiversity factors (e.g. investigating the basal area and the number of tree species).

As a final step, the cross-cutting analyses of all three programs were merged in a synthesis report.

Assessing the Impacts of Multinational Corporations on Global Development and Value Creation (Global Value)

The importance of multinational corporations for furthering global economic and social development is well established. Corporations invest in foreign countries, provide jobs, and thus generate formalized labor relations and income. Furthermore, they pay taxes that contribute to the provision of public services. At the same time, multinational corporations particularly have received criticism by being accused of supporting exploitative employment conditions and human rights abuses, causing environmental deterioration, and failing to mainstream responsible conduct in developing countries.

The GLOBAL VALUE project developed an innovative framework for assessing impacts of multinational corporations on issues related to sustainable development, working conditions, human rights, transparency, and anti-corruption. It shed light on institutional arrangement; analysed systems of governance for responsible business practices; explored responsible competitiveness; assessed the complementarity of public and private sector activities; and derived recommendations for decision makers in business, policy and non-governmental organisations.

The project was carried out by universities and civil society organisations from Europe and ICPC countries. A toolkit for impact evaluation was developed and tested in close collaboration with leading multinational corporations (BATA (garment, Bangladesh), OLAM (food, Tanzania) and NOKIA (ICT, India)).
The main responsibility of CEval was the development of an indicator-set for the framework which is based on Millennium Development Goals, human rights, gender & diversity, and anti-corruption & transparency and takes corporate management approaches (supply chain management, life cycle analysis and base-of-pyramid) as well as systems of governance for responsible business practices, competitiveness, and complementarity with official development aid (ODA) into account. In addition, it carried out two research case studies focusing on the complementarity of ODA with multinational corporations´ activities.

Evaluation of the PTB blended-learning course “Quality Infrastructure for Sustainable Development” (QuISP)

The Center for Evaluation (CEval) had been mandated to conduct an evaluation of the blended-learning course ‘Quality Infrastructure for Sustainable Development’ (QuISP) which was developed and implemented by the Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt (PTB). The course aims at improving the Quality Infrastructure (QI) in developing countries by building up individual and institutional capacities particularly with regard to standardization and related disciplines.

The objective of the evaluation was to provide relevant information for the improvement of the QuISP training course with regard to its future implementation and potential scaling up.

Final Evaluation Evaluation of SCAMPIS Scaling up micro-irrigation systems in India, Madagascar and Guatemala

Since 1977, IFAD has worked to raise productivity and income of rural poor populations to overcome poverty and improve the quality of their lives. In its long history, the Fund has developed and implemented various programs and projects all over the world. Scaling up micro-irrigation systems in India, Madagascar and Guatemala (SCAMPIS) is one of the IFAD’’s projects, financed by COOPERNIC with a budget of 3 million Euro. In the period of 2008-2012, it has aimed at improving livelihoods and food security of 30.000 smallholder households in the three pilot countries of India, Madagascar and Guatemala by providing them with micro irrigation systems (MIS) and liquid organic fertilizer systems (LOF).
Before the program phased out in December 2012, an external evaluation of SCAMPIS was conducted in order to assess the achievement of program objectives and outcomes. In particular, according to the Terms of Reference, the evaluation had pursued three objectives:

  • The review assessed the achievement of the programme objectives and outcomes with regard to its components and corresponding target groups.
  • Lessons learnt and recommendations were provided for IFAD with regard to improvement of design and implementation of future programs. Replicability and scaling up were core concepts in this context.
  • Special attention was put on the sustainability especially with regard to any future activities to be implemented by the different stakeholders along the water value chain of MIS/LOF.

The CEval evaluation team visited each project country for 12 days to conduct interviews with main stakeholders in the implementing organizations, key persons along the MIS value chain and the primary beneficiaries. In addition, a quantitative survey had been conducted in each of the three project countries to learn more about the impact MIS has on food security in different country contexts. Finally, IFAD’s perspective was taken into account by using data from interviews with most important representatives for the SCAMPIS project.

East4South – Development Awareness from the Roots

Subject of the evaluation was the EU-funded project of the Deutsche Welle Academy (DWA) „East4South – Development Awareness from the Roots”. The project’s overall goal was to raise awareness about development issues among EU-12 citizens and positively changing their attitude towards EU development policy. The project aimed specifically at enabling the EU12 journalists to prepare high quality media products covering development issues and to publish them in their home countries’ media by providing training in intercultural journalism and on-site research and a media production stay in Africa for young journalists from EU-12 countries. In the course of the project a total of 60 young journalists from Eastern Europe and Africa were fostered and supported when creating their own network.

Goal of the summative ex-post evaluation was to verify and analyze the outcome of the project activities and the quality of the project management. The CEval GmbH followed a mixed-method approach combining in-depth stakeholder interviews and secondary and document analysis of module evaluation surveys and participants’ short reports with a standardized online survey of all participants.

Development and Implementation of a M&E-System for the Plan Honduras Project "Prevention, Protection and rights Restitution for Girls and Boys survivors of sexual violence"

The overarching objective of the Plan Honduras project was that girls and boys are protected from sexual violence and had access to child friendly and competent prevention and attention mechanisms from local to national level. In order to achieve this objective, Plan Honduras developed an action programme that was to strengthen prevention, protection and attention capabilities for at-risk girls and boys and survivors of sexual violence in the family, community, municipality, departments and at the national level.
The task of the Center for Evaluation (CEval) in this framework was to assist and consult the process of developing and implementing an impact oriented gender sensitive M&E-system that could be used throughout the project cycle and beyond. Therefore the CEval adviced and trained project executives and partners in order to enable them to systematically monitor and evaluate project related activities, to identify the most relevant aspects on all impact levels, to formulate impact oriented qualitative indicators for the project contributing to gender equality, to design a data collection plan and instruments and to solve occurring challenges during the data collection and analysis process.
The knowledge transfer was facilitated through a combination of continuous consultancy, training measures and practical implementation of the consultancy and training content within an accompanied baseline study including a gender analysis as well as an accompanied interim and a final project evaluation.

Impact Evaluation of WIENCO Ghana Ltd. Out-grower Schemes

The overall objective of the impact evaluation was to measure and evaluate the investment of the Agricultural Trade and Investment Fund (AATIF) in two of WIENCO’s out-grower schemes in Ghana. In particular, two out-grower arrangements, the Cocoa Abrabopa Association for cocoa farmers and the Masara N’Arziki for maize farmers, were under investigation. The main interest lied in identifying the causal link between participating in WIENCO’s out-grower arrangements and the following outcomes and their development over time:

  • Productivity Levels
  • Employment opportunities
  • Farm and overall household income
  • Living and working conditions
  • Risk exposure regarding total household income; and
  • Farm-households’ risk coping strategies and mechanisms.

This shall provide AATIF with evidence on the effectiveness of funding out-grower schemes. In addition a simplified tool allowing WIENCO to collect data on the key outcomes shall be designed.

The 5-year evaluation will be conducted by a consortium of the Center for Evaluation (CEval) and the German Institute for Global and Area Studies (GIGA), together with Ghanaian partners. A mixed-method approach had been embedded in a profound contextual analysis. The evaluation combined a quantitative analysis of household and village surveys with qualitative insight into WIENCO’s impacts derived from focus group discussions (FGDs) and expert interviews. The reports provided the counterpart with robust evaluation results while also presenting practical recommendations to improve WIENCO’s activities.

Trend and impact study on fair trade in Germany

Fair trade had been an issue in Germany for over 40 years now and has received increasing public awareness ever since. The impacts of fair trade in the producer countries of fairly traded goods and products have been the subject of numerous studies. By contrast, insights on how fair trade affects the consumer countries of these goods and products to date are scarce.
The study implemented by CEval on fair trade in Germany addresses this gap. It aimed at identifying the societal changes and trends that have been evoked by fair trade in Germany and to determine how the fair trade movement contributed to these changes.

In doing so, a participative approach made sure that the expertise and perspectives of relevant actors are adequately reflected in the study. Furthermore, the study approached its research subject drawing on a theory-based approach and employed a balanced mix of qualitative and quantitative methods.

An intensive literature study, qualitative expert interviews, focus group discussions, online surveys and a telephone consumer survey were carried out to collect data. The data was evaluated using qualitative content analyses, time series analyses and descriptive statistical evaluations. Once the data had been analyzed, the results of the study were compiled in a report and discussed at a final workshop together with those who commissioned and supported the study.